![]() Furthermore, quite a lot of the songs are recent live recordings, as opposed to the classic studio versions. And for a band with a fairly slim back catalogue, it's a shame that it doesn't even feature excerpts from all of their most famous tracks. There isn't any narrative that documents the rise of the Roses or discusses their albums or singles. While there is some archive footage, there isn't a lot (an especial shame seeing as the car crash interview with Ian Brown and John Squire from the archives is one of the best moments). The chief drawback is in fairness not so much a criticism of the film but maybe more one of expectation and that is that this doesn't really tell the story of the band, it actually specifically documents their reformation. So the question has to be does it do the band and their music justice?The answer is yes and no. So it seemed entirely appropriate that a film should be made to document their story. They recently reformed to massive excitement and a whole new legion of fans. They didn't really record very much but a lot of what they did has proved remarkably timeless and sounds as invigorating today as it did back in the day. In many ways their music set the scene for the musical landscape of British rock of the 90's. The Stone Roses are definitely a seminal band.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |